Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jason Levin's avatar

“Your first channel for growth is likely that channel for a reason: it was the most optimal one”

So true. X was first and optimal for my meme software (https://memelord.tech). People ask why not IG, well X was first and most natural for me. Sometimes most natural is best too because it’s the one you can do all day.

Expand full comment
Yvloxas's avatar

Nice to have this concisely in one place.

In some ways, I think the most practical line for a lot of founders is: “If the honest answer to any of those questions is “not yet,” your time is better spent deepening product value rather than sprinkling on channels that can only deliver marginal gains.” And yet, my experience is that this is a hard message for them—whether to come to the conclusion on their own (with your article) or to hear it from their team.

Creating product value is or feels like more effort than acquisition. This is particularly true if the leader is not only not product-minded, but not particularly passionate about their product domain either—that is, if they largely view the business as a business. Their experience is more like playing GM for an NBA team than playing basketball. From that perch, pressing the marketing buttons harder rather than developing products feels like they’re more in control. It feels less open ended. Acquisition is not linear or straightforward, but it can look that way to an executive, especially relative to product development. If you don’t enjoy creating or iterating products and you did just enough of that to get past raising or early pmf stage, you’re going to try to avoid going back.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts